add pdf generation

report-1/assambly_assignments.md

@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
 ---
 path: /elektro/hr/rts10/
 tags: kladjes, elektro, elektro/hr, elektro/hr/rts10
-auther: 
-  - Finley van Reenen (0964590@hr.nl)
-auther_short: "E.L.F. van Reenen"
 ---
 
-# Assembly Assignments
+[parent](/lLnsoW2yQlWpblaVBRFsYw)
+
+# Assembly Assignment
 
 This is the first report for _realtime systems 10_. I needed to do the following assignments:
 
@@ -38,8 +37,8 @@ I applied the same fix as last year. In the debug config, replace the `\` with a
 
 The algorithm in question is given in C code.
 
-```c-like=
-unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
+```c {.numberLines}
+unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
 {
     unsigned int m = 0;
     for (unsigned int i = 0; i != a; i ++)
@@ -52,8 +51,8 @@ unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
 
 This code can be simplified without changing the algorithm by replacing the variable `i` with `b`. This will result in the following code.
 
-```c-like=
-unsigned int multiply ( unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
+```c {.numberLines}
+unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
 {
     unsigned int m = 0;
     for (; b > 0; b --)
@@ -66,7 +65,7 @@ unsigned int multiply ( unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
 
 This is also the code I have implemented. The compiler puts _a_ in `R0` and _b_ in `R1`, I accepted them in place and used `R2` for _m_. At the end _m_ (`R2`) is moved to `R0` to set it as the return value. 
 
-```ass=
+```asm {.numberLines}
     .cpu cortex-m4
     .thumb
     .syntax unified
@@ -88,8 +87,8 @@ mul_exit:
 
 a better representation of the essembly code in C would be:
 
-```c-like=
-unsigned int multiply ( unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
+```c {.numberLines}
+unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
 {
     unsigned int m = 0;
     if (b == 0) {
@@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ unsigned int multiply ( unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
 
     do
     {
-        m = m + b;
+        m = m + a;
         b --;
     } while (b > 0)
 
@@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ It does not take the branch at line 10 and at line 14 it takes the branch 65535
 
 Now a smarter version.
 
-```c-like=
+```c {.numberLines}
 unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
 {
     unsigned int m = 0;
@@ -134,7 +133,7 @@ unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
 }
 ```
 
-```asm=
+```asm {.numberLines}
     .cpu cortex-m4
     .thumb
     .syntax unified
@@ -162,8 +161,8 @@ bmul_exit:
 
 a better representation of the essembly code in C would be:
 
-```c-like=
-unsigned int multiply ( unsigned int a , unsigned int b)
+```c {.numberLines}
+unsigned int multiply(unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
 {
     unsigned int m = 0;
     if (b == 0) {
@@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ There are 7 instructions in the loop where one only runs every `1` bit in `b`. T
 
 ## Assignment 10: Using your multiply function to calculate the dot product of two vectors
 
-```c-like=
+```c {.numberLines}
 unsigned int dotProduct(unsigned int a[], unsigned int b[], size_t n)
 {
     unsigned int p = 0;
@@ -206,7 +205,7 @@ unsigned int dotProduct(unsigned int a[], unsigned int b[], size_t n)
 
 This function needs to call another and remember 5 variables (`*a`, `*b`, `n`, `p` and `i`). `R0` through⁣ `R3` are expected to change with a function call. There are only `R4` through `R7` left, only four spots. To solve this problem, I reversed the for loop by using n and decrementing it. This will not change the result since addition is not order sensitive. The code I implemented is the following.
 
-```c-like=
+```c {.numberLines}
 unsigned int dotProduct(unsigned int a[] , unsigned int b[], size_t n)
 {
     unsigned int p = 0;
@@ -225,7 +224,7 @@ unsigned int dotProduct(unsigned int a[] , unsigned int b[], size_t n)
 
 My assembly code:
 
-```asm=
+```asm {.numberLines}
     .cpu cortex-m4
     .thumb
     .syntax unified
@@ -252,5 +251,4 @@ dotp_loop:
 dotp_exit:
     MOVS.N  R0, R7      // move m to R0
     POP.N   {R4, R5, R6, R7, PC}
-    BX.N    LR
 ```

report-1/assambly_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+sub_title: "Real Time Systems 10"
+auther: 
+  - name: "Finley van Reenen (0964590)"
+    email: "mail@lailatheelf.nl"
+    name_short: "E.L.F. van Reenen"
+---
+
+# Assambly Report
+
+[toc]
+
+![](/report-1/assambly_assignments.md)
+
+![](/report-1/week_1.2.md)
+

report-1/week_1.2.md

@@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ while ((FLASH->ACR & /* ... */ ) == 0);
 Finaly we configur the PLL itself.
 
 $$
-f_{(VCO\ clock)} = f_{(PLL\ clock\ input)} \cdot (\frac{PLLN}{PLLM}) \\
+f_{(VCO\ clock)} = f_{(PLL\ clock\ input)} \cdot (\frac{PLLN}{PLLM})
+$$
+$$
 f_{(PLL\ general\ clock\ output)} = \frac{f_{(VCO\ clock)}}{PLLP}
 $$